Friday, February 15, 2013

Waiting for goat doe

A couple of days ago, I received an email from our friend MB; she had injected one of her goats, who was hugely pregnant, with deximethisone, so she should be giving birth in exactly 36 hours, at 8:30 in the morning on Sunday.  Would I like to watch, learn, and assist?

In the words of Butterfly McQueen, I don’t know nothin’ about birthin’ babies, so I accepted the invitation.  Sunday morning chores ran a little long, so I called MB at a little after 8:00 on Sunday, asking if arriving at 9:30 would mean missing the show.  I was reassured that I probably wouldn’t miss a thing, since the goat, Madeline, showed no signs of starting labor. 

I arrived at MB’s farm, and found MB trying to convince Madeline to get started.  The very knowledgeable vet was adamant that "deximethisone + 36 hours  = birth," but
Madeline apparently was not buying it.  However, she should have been.  She was huge and uncomfortable, the kids inside her stretching her to over twice her normal width.  (Nigerian Dwarf goats, when gravid, are about as wide as they are long.  They wheeze and snore because their lungs are compressed, they waddle and creak because their cartilage is softening, they urp and burp at a higher than normal rate because their rumens are squoze.  No uncomfortable waddle matches that of a doe great with four kids.  To pregnant humans they give the dubious consolation that it could be worse.)

As the day wore on, MB and I spent hours watching Madeline.  The tendons in her tail softened and practically disappeared.  “That’s a sign,” said MB, that labor is imminent.  What does imminent mean?  An hour, maybe two, or maybe a couple of days.  Madeline sat like a dog, her enormous belly making her look like a Buddha.  “That’s a sign,” said MB, and she’d give something that looked like a contraction—and then produce a cud.  She’d grind her teeth in pain—“Sometimes that’s a sign”—and yawn—“that’s a sign too”—and her abdomen would heave…and she’d produce another cud.  I stayed until 5:00, when I had to go home and feed my critters.

I returned later that evening; I had nothing else to do, and I needed to stay up late to meet the Real Doctor at the airport.  Besides, Madeline had started whimpering, and was making a nest—“those are signs, usually”.  As of 1:00 AM, nothing had happened.  MB checked on her every couple of hours through the night.

The following day, the Real Doctor and I got to MB’s farm around noon.  Nothing had happened overnight, and while the morning had not been quiet (a barn full of massively pregnant goats is loud, with all the wheezing, whining, and complaining), no signs of labor had been noted.  However, by early afternoon, Madeline had firmly settled into a nest and had started real, non-cud-producing contractions.  However many kids were inside her massive belly, they had realigned themselves.  She was no longer as wide, but so distended that if she walked, her belly practically dragged on the straw. 

Real, productive labor started mid-afternoon.  I won’t go into the details of the process, other than it involved a little intervention from MB, and a deal of justifiably loud complaining from Madeline.  Over the course of about two hours, three does and one buck came into the world and started suckling, complaining, sleeping, and being cute. 
I wanted to learn about the birthing process so I’ll be ready when our goats start kidding later this year.  I still need to know more (and fortunately, MB has a bunch more gravid does), but MB pointed out one clear lesson from the 72-hour vigil for Madeline:  goats haven’t read the textbooks, and they will do what they do when they do it.

Wednesday, February 13, 2013

Wednesday Words Hunger Game edition

What's the common theme?
a) Kwashiorkor
b) Pellagra
c) Beri Beri
d) Marasmus
Answer will appear later this week.

Tuesday, February 12, 2013

Tuesday Tool Muddy Mire edition

Today's tool--this week's tool--the tool of the last couple of weeks--is the combo of the drywall mud pan and the mudding knife.  I've been spending a lot of time with these recently, trying to get the drywall in the new bathroom finished.  The job was started by a professional drywall guy, because the tile guy needed to have the drywall in place to do his job.  However, the job was not finished by the drywall guy because I am cheap.  Rather than pay the pro to do the taping and mudding, I am doing it.  I feel like I am atoning for something.

Mudding drywall is harder than it sounds.  The tape (if you use paper tape, which the pros do*) loves to bubble and buckle.  The mud loves to clump and cling to the knife (which is really a spatula).  I've asked various people (including the drywall guy) for advice.  All have given me advice, then either suggested I get a pro to do it, or said "that's why drywall guys are paid so well."

I haven't even got to the sanding yet.  I don't think I'm rich enough for the Tuesday Tool to be the Porter Cable power drywall sander that I saw at Oregon Tool.

*The fiber tape costs about ten times as much.  If you're not a pro, for pete's sake, use the fiber tape.  You will not regret it.

Saturday, February 9, 2013

Testosterone surge

We entered winter with sixteen Shetland sheep, all ewes, and six Dwarf Nigerian goats, all does. So far, we’ve been increasing our herd by buying animals—the Real Doctor has done hours and hours of homework, carefully selecting those animals with good genetics and good conformation.  It’s kind of like fantasy baseball, choosing a squad that’s as good as possible, but fantasy is constrained by realities of availability and cost.  We’ve also obtained a few animals that weren’t exactly our first-round draft picks, but that were very good deals, because the seller was moving or getting out of the sheep biz. 

This mode of herd growth suits me just fine, but the Real Doctor assures me that there is another way.  Strange as it is to me as a microbiologist, the Real Doctor tells me that you can both increase the number of animals and reap the benefits of genetic recombination by combining haploid cells from two animals—but you need male animals to do this.  I admit, I have had some reservations about this way to grow a herd.  Consultation with textbooks has reassured me about the biological plausibility, but the male animals themselves give me pause.  

First, there’s some terminology: male goats are bucks, not billys.  Goat people give you the hairy eyeball if you call male goats billys.  So, bucks.  Bucks are weird.  They have some behaviors that simply are not fit for polite society, impolite society, or any human society. There is a medical term, hircismus, describing “offensive odor of the axillae,” or foul body odor, and tellingly, the word is derived from a Latin word for a he-goat (sorry, buck.  I keep forgetting).  Bucks have an earned reputation for single-minded lechery.  And, they butt.  One of the contractors who worked here related the story of a friend of his who wanted to see what butting was like.  So, he donned a football helmet and challenged a buck.  One bop, and the contractor’s friend was k.o.’d. 

Well, we don’t have just one buck, we now have two bucks.  There’s Guy Fawkes, the seasoned pro, and Arion, the naïve yearling.  
Guy (left) and Arion (right). 
 Having just one buck is a problem—goats and sheep are herd animals, and keeping one by itself makes it go crazy(er).  They do have their unmentionable behaviors, but if you don’t watch them, you do don’t see them doing it.  They smell, though not as bad as I had feared—every once in a while, there’s a breeze that smells like an accident in a feta cheese factory, but that’s all.  They are lecherous, but fortunately my resemblance to a female goat is so slight that they don’t try anything with me.  And so far, the macho posturing has been minimal—they’ve been polled, so between the two of them, they have maybe six cm of horn.  They don’t butt each other much at all.  They’re not all that noisy; their call is an embarrassingly effete, quiet, apologetically squeaky “mee-eh-eh-eh-eh.”  They are a bit dumber than their sister-folk.  I can’t say I like them as much as the does, but I guess I’m reconciled to them. 

Then, there’s rams.  With a polled, fifteen-kilogram buck that comes up to your knees, there’s not too much to be afraid of.  However, rams are scary, and anyone who works with rams knows that you have to watch your back when you’re with them, even cute little Shetland rams.  They lack the bucks’ rich bouquet of personality quirks—everything seems to be about butting.

We now have two rams, a pair for the same reason we have two bucks.  We got them a week ago, much sooner than we were planning on acquiring any rams.  However, a friend had a ram with excellent genes, but just didn’t get along with any of her other animals—so, as long as our friend can use his services, he’s ours.  Also, our friend has a buddy who is shutting down her sheep operation, and she had a really nice ram, and another ewe, going at a fire sale price, so we picked up both of those animals too.

Rams, like any ruminants, need at least one companion.  However, they also need to know their place in the herd hierarchy, even if the herd is only two.  So, at first, they spent most of their time butting each other.  We were advised to keep them in a small pen rather than an open pasture, so they couldn’t gain too much momentum before impact, so I built them a 5-by-8 pen and closed them in.  After that, I couldn’t watch; I don’t like violence, and even though I knew it was their program and that they weren’t just built for it, but they needed it, I found it disturbing enough to turn my stomach.  Going to bed at night, it sounded like distant artillery—a steady, muffled “whhhump… … …whhhump…” that would go on for a half hour, then pause, then resume.  It continued in the morning. 

After a couple of days, the rams seem to have sorted out the general terms of their social contract (Glenfiddich is the boss, Pirate is the underling; both have the scars of negotiation on their heads).  
Glenfiddich (left) and Pirate (right) in their momentum-limiting pen.  Blow up the picture to see the battle scars.
There are still occasional collisions to iron out the details of their relationship, and we’ve been advised to keep them penned up for a week or more to make sure that everything is resolved.  It’s been a week, and for the last few days their efforts have been less focused on damaging each other, and more concentrated on damaging their pen.  They have smashed the door of their pen three times, and I’ve spent a lot of time and hardware reinforcing it.  Instead of waking up to the noise of a distant artillery duel, I woke up this morning to the sound of splintering wood.

This doesn’t endear them to me; I don’t appreciate my work being trashed, and I don’t appreciate having to fix it in the cold and dark.  It’s especially unnerving to do work on the inside of the pen when the rams are pawing at the ground and looking at you as if they’re wondering exactly which of your ribs they’d like to break on their scarred foreheads.  So, while I like the ewes and does and most of the chooks, and I am even getting along well enough with the boy goats—no, with the bucks—the rams are still a problem for me.  I hope they calm down, and that we can at least achieve détente.  And we should see lambs and kids ere too long, and they are loveable. 

Friday, February 8, 2013

Friday Fungus...purrrrrrple

Still too wet and wintry to have Friday Flora, but the fungi are loving life.  Here's another fine specimen from a few weeks ago, sighted along the North Umpqua Trail:

Probably Cortinarius violaceus.  About 4-7 cm across, and a deep purple color that just doesn't photograph well in the murky gloom of a thick cedar forest.

Thursday, February 7, 2013

Why didn't I know about this?!?!?!

In case you were wondering about my musical tastes, there's some things about which I'm an unabashed enthusiast. 

I really like Bach's "Goldberg" Variations.  I started off falling in love with the 1955 Gould recording, then getting seduced by the 1981 Gould recording, attended a good performance by Peter Serkin and a great performance by Jeremy Denk, not to mention the great recording by by Simone Dinnerstein.  The Goldbergs are one of the desert-island ten; I'd have a real hard time deciding which recording to take. 

I am an avid fan of what some see as excesses of late 19th-early 20th century Romantic pianism--the overcooked exuberance of Godowsky, Brahms, Liszt, Busoni, and their ilk.  I especially like it when they took the music of an earlier era and reworked it for their own ends; I have oodles of recordings of Bach in transcription.  Chasing this genus of genius leads one to the music of composers who are still really good, just not well-remembered, such as Rheinberger and Reger.

Also, I've always been a great fan of piano music for four (or six, or eight, or one) hands.  My first piano teacher, Mr. Bangs (really, that was his name), was really into the stuff, and his enthusiasm spread.  He got me and brother M. to play some of the Dvorak Slavonic dances, and ever since, whenever I meet someone who is also a pianist, I work my way around to see if they're interested.

So I wonder how it is that I only found out about the overlap of these sets

just a couple of days ago? Joseph Rheinberger--friend of Brahms, teacher, composer mainly remembered for tons of organ and choral music, but also author of lots of excellent chamber and piano stuff (not to mention some good 4-hand music) decided that the Goldbergs needed to be popularized.  They're awkward to play, being written for a two-manual harpsichord, so he figured he'd split the music between two pianos.  And, being a romantic, he felt that the writing was a bit spare, so he fleshed it out, just a bit.  A few decades later, Max Reger* a composer of similar sympathies, felt that the arrangement was OK, but needed a little more.  So, there we have it.  And there it sat for a hundred years. 

Well, no matter.  Pretty much as soon as I became aware of it, I went and purchased a recording
 and downloaded the score from IMSLP.

It's fabulous, meets and exceeds expectations, scratches all my itches and pushes all my buttons.  There's a You Tube video of a few minutes of the piece, if you want to get a taste. 

*Today, Reger is most famous for his reply to a music critic: "I am sitting in the smallest room of my house. Your review is in front of me. Soon, it will be behind me."

Wednesday, February 6, 2013

Wednesday Wordage...eeew

"Living Green" may be a perfectly acceptable brand name--it conjures up vitality and ecological virtue.  Toilet paper is also a good thing, although the preferred euphemism for selling it seems to be "bathroom tissue".  However, when the package says "Living green bathroom tissue," vile images run through my mind.